Wednesday, September 25, 2019

Age bias permeates ads -- and technology design

Getty images show advertising’s ageist stereotypes.  A new report from AARP this week zeros in on something we all knew: Advertisers focus on the young – not unlike the tech firms who make products being advertised.  Despite the 50+ population representing one third of the US population, they only show up in 13% of advertising imagery. The AARP report authors analyzed the Getty images – and observed that even though 69% of people aged 65-73 own a smartphone, less the 5% of the images of technology included any older adults. The same held true for images of worker. while one third (53 million) of the labor force is 50+, only 13% showed them working -- otherwise they were shown at home, with a partner or in a medical setting. And the kicker: 81% of the employees of advertising agencies are younger than 55 -- their ageism is well-documented.

Does ad imagery explain why older people are largely ignored by Silicon Valley? If you work in a Silicon Valley tech company, the odds are that you are a millennial (20-33) -- hired at a rate that is not reflective of the working age population.  What you are not is a boomer between the ages of 52-70 -- they are hired at 60% less than their workforce representation.  So naturally older population doesn’t work in the companies that make the smartphones, tablets, and apps that at least 69% of them use.  But vendors think this is okay -- it likely reinforced by the lack of visibility of older people, despite their wealth dominance, in advertising seen by these younger workers. And you likely know that most are not seeking older adults to help test the usability of devices.

Does age bias explain why tech firms do such a poor job of design?  Let’s assume that older people don’t work there, including in the user experience and testing departments.  Let’s also assume that the problems older adults may have with their products are poorly understood.  Yet there are some organizations that want to get the attention of tech companies – by organizing groups of older people to provide feedback, creating product lines to help deal with the plethora of tech complexity in their homes, offering websites to demystify products that should not be mysterious, adding training to help older adults demystify the utility and poor usability of products.

The ultimate irony is to have to advertise when design works. Amazon has just created a designation for its smart home tech callled Certified for Humans – attempting in a (mostly) non-condescending way to point out the obvious -- that technology, certainly smart home tech, is NOT 'certified for humans' or out of the box usable.  Similarly, how much tech in your life preserved the use of dials, versus screen taps or buttons, the way airplane cockpits still must?  Or car dashboard tech so non-intuitive that it mandates a read of the manual?  Nothing against manuals, but in this age of turning on a device and having it say “Hello!”, some firms set an expectation that all tech should be so welcoming. Sadly, a day spent setting up a smartphone (apps, preferences, undoing defaults, etc.) misses that expectation by a mile.



from Tips For Aging In Place https://www.ageinplacetech.com/blog/age-bias-permeates-ads-and-technology-design

Wednesday, September 18, 2019

2019 Ten Tips for Your New Product or Service Business

It’s 2019 and in full sprint to the year-end finish. Soon you will launch a boomer/senior, home health tech product or service, or maybe a caregiver advisory service.  As your company gets ready to travel into battle or a booth this fall with the sound of lively pitches all around, it is time to for you to revisit this guidance. Perhaps sometime soon, your new or existing company will officially launch a new product or service, or perhaps a long-awaited, over-described and much-anticipated offering will finally ship. First read existing content and research reports on your particular market segment.  Look over this updated checklist that continues to hold true – with updated links and references. If necessary, refine tactics:

1) Is the website crisp and clear? Start with the home page that has modest and friendly graphics and images (not a ransom note with 27 different font size and colors) to identify what the product or service does or is. Don't lead with fear-generating images or force the viewer to start with a video. Skip paragraphs of narrative-laden terminology to wander through before it is apparent what the product or service does. Nor does the reverse make sense -- a single graphic, with an interface designed only to be viewed on a smartphone. Make sure to specify how it works, for whom, with multiple tabs for multiple markets, and device-appropriate viewing. To encapsulate the impact of a product, videos of actual use are best

2) With every new launch, is there a press release? A single release is inexpensive on Business Wire or PRNewsire -- content that will surface on newly-created Google alerts long after the launch date.  Not a PDF file, not a Word file, but a viewable (online) press release with links, kept under 1 page, that is found under your website category of PRESS, MEDIA or NEWS. Descriptive titles are a must -- multi-line titles are ridiculous. To be perceived as an ongoing concern and not have viewers speculate about whether the company is still in business, a press release should be issued for every significant business change, including new executives or customers, moves to new offices, etc., with at least one in the past 3-4 months.

3) Are executives identified in 'About' the company? What's the point of keeping the identities of founders and executives a secret unless there's something to hide? This is as true of offerings that sell through resellers as those that sell direct. (For an example, see an About Us that is not, uh, About Us.)  There is absolutely no reason to have to search Google or send e-mails to Info@XYZ - co.com in order to find out who is running the place or tease out that XYZ- co.com is actually a subsidiary of GIANT - CO.com or to call in order to find out that the real service is provided by another company, not identified on the website. 

4) Pre-brief an industry analyst and the media.  Especially if the product will be launched at a trade show, pre-show briefing of an analyst enables the firm to refer reporters to the analyst to understand where the offering fits in an industry or for just for press quotes that could be included in a launch press release  In addition to pre-briefing, if there is a PR firm (or even if there isn’t), contact a local news site and see if they’d like to learn more about a home town entrepreneur – with a great new offering that they (or their families) need to know about. 

5) Is the actual product or service going to be available near term?  What’s that mean? By the official launch date, some stages of evolution are complete or within a few weeks of completion. For example, there's a working prototype (i.e. no known installation or operational defects); there are identified manufacturers; committed partners; an initial pilot is completed to validate usefulness; the pricing is clear; power requirements are clear; the software works; the product registration and installation processes have been established and validated. It's not okay -- and I would argue a waste of money – if the actual launch date is an unknown or l-o-o-n-g number of months later. Momentum is lost, especially if the reason for the delay is that the pilot revealed that it doesn’t work yet.. Pre-orders seem to be all the (Indiegogo) rage as a marketing tactic -- hopefully the ultimate offering on whatever date doesn't result in the rage of missed expectations, or a nasty review on an Amazon website.

6) Software vendors -- design with market input (not your grandmother!). Prospective B2B buyers are jaded -- they've seen many variants of software, for example, for home care services, senior housing, or non-profit segments. Although it may have seemed that way in 2016, these are not industries ready for 'if we build it, they will come'. And I hear too many entrepreneurs say the following: "In my personal experience, my family had issues with (fill in the blank) with my own (grand)parents, therefore my offering will address those issues by (fill in the blank)." For most participants in the age-or care-related industry, a personal experience underpins enthusiasm to be in this emerging space. If that is a given for your company, shake it off -- validate prospective value through interviews, surveys, and follow with software design or website walkthroughs -- before casting the solution into the concrete of release-ready code. And if you're a smartphone or app vendor, test your offering with the full range of older adults, including people aged 75+.

7) Service providers -- what's different, who will buy, at what price, where do they live?  With an inbox filled with "we are introducing a new service for (pick one -- finding caregivers, housing, helping families, seniors) that will be the first comprehensive guide/service to (fill in blank)". But really, there is no need to do a nationwide media launch of a service that is initially only available within a single geographic region. On the flip side, if the service is in the process of nationwide expansion, call or stay tuned – maybe your product fits into the service or ecosystem.

8) What's that product or service category, anyway? It helps those who might want to accurately position what you're doing -- and this includes press, analysts, investors, prospective partners and resellers -- to understand the category placement and not have to inquire amid a sea of obfuscation and inappropriate terminology. Is this a home health care service or a companion care service? They are licensed differently -- does the firm offer both, at different prices? Is this a tool for chronic disease management (not exactly 'wellness') or is this one for tracking a fitness regimen (sounds like wellness)?  Finally, as with fall detection, is this product really a feature of other products or is it viable on its own as a solution? As with a new variant of sensor-based home monitoring, is this a category, even if it is renamed IoT? And if this is the revival of a previous movement, like smart homes, why are new-aged versions less intrusive, more robust and secure than previous home security/automation?

9) PR team, this means you. Before scheduling a briefing, please do the research in case your clients don't tell you much.  In the category of baffling, I've received requests to brief me about a vendor, an offering, a launch that I've already written about or mentioned for months. Just because it's Day One for you, the PR firm, and you're excitedly new to this space, doesn't mean that your client and offerings are heretofore completely unknown. Please search the Internet first. Perhaps you are helping to inform about a new release, and the news is actually new. Or it is not new, just repackaged. Just know what has preceded it -- and build upon prior activity. Anything else reflects poorly on the company that hired you. It can’t hurt to read up on briefing analysts.

10) As for the non-launch launch, what if market interest happens anyway? Can you offer up a customer or user to interview, can you say how your offering fits into the marketplace (current use of your product, who are other players, market size if available, and target audience)?  And most important, can someone in this very needy market actually buy that robotic cat? (Good answer: Yes).  If you're not ready, say you're not ready. You know that there is a gap in capability in your target market and your company is just the right company to fill that gap -- and even better, do it with software on an existing hardware or software platform. No need to rush or launch too early -- because that's the thing about an emerging market to serve an aging population. The customer segment will be around for a long time. Let's not disappoint them.

Hope to see you at upcoming events in NaplesWashington, and Tampa!

[To read more about this topic, click on Aging in Place Technology Watch]



from Tips For Aging In Place https://www.ageinplacetech.com/blog/2019-ten-tips-your-new-product-or-service-business

Thursday, September 12, 2019

Loneliness and social isolation – focus is there, solutions are emerging

Heightened focus on social isolation has resulted in more research, greater concern.  Since the initial correlation between loneliness, social isolation and poor health outcomes, new reports have emerged to try and understand why people are lonely and what can be done to mitigate it. AARP, which has been researching the subject since 2010, released new survey results in 2018 confirming the same percentage – 35 percent of adults age 45+ are lonely – but with a growing number of older adults in the population, this represents an additional five million adults based on census data and asks them to assess their health. Today, Aging in Place Technology Watch and GreatCall have published a new white paper about initiatives to fight social isolation -- a few of the points are excerpted here:

 What has changed in the past two years?  First, the research.  Once the correlation between social isolation and poorer health outcomes was made, the volume of research spiked. From its pre-correlation measurement in the 1996 UCLA Loneliness Scale, a number of other surveys have been released that include correlation with health care costs, economic status, and lifestyle preferences. In late 2017, research from AARP’s Public Policy Institute concluded that socially isolated older adults cost the U.S. health system an additional $6.7 billion in health-related spending. Newer research from the National Institute on Aging is focusing on the connections between loneliness, long viewed as a predictor of cognitive decline, and other health risks, including:  high blood pressureheart diseaseobesity, a weakened immune system, anxiety, depressioncognitive declineAlzheimer’s disease, and even death.

Social isolation – is this a worsening 21st century phenomenon? Is social isolation more of a problem today than in the past. And, what is the prognosis for the future? The recent AARP report zeroed in on the key predictors of loneliness, sometimes referred to as “perceived social isolation.” Living situations and marital status may provide a clue to societal changes that result in social isolation and loneliness. In 2018, the Administration for Community Living (ACL) released its survey profile of older Americans (age 65+). It showed that while only 14 percent of the 65+ population lives alone, almost half (45 percent) of women aged 75+ live by themselves. According to Pew Research, among those 65 and older, the divorce rate has tripled since 1990.

A top predictor of loneliness is size and quality of one’s social network.  To assess these elements and their connection to loneliness, the AARP respondents were asked for both the number of people in their lives who have been supportive in the past year and the number with whom they can discuss matters of personal importance. From the study: “As expected, as one’s social network increases, loneliness decreases. Also as expected, as physical isolation decreases (the factor which included items such as disability status, number of hours spent alone and household size), so does loneliness.”

Health limitations can exacerbate social isolation. While loneliness and social isolation are emerging as public health issues, less has been published about the health issues that may lead to social isolation: mobility limitations, depression, cognitive impairment and hearing loss.  In another study, older adults with mobility impairments were more likely to report being isolated from friends. These surveys underscore the fact that elderly people are the most likely to experience social isolation and its related health effects. According to a UK study, those who provide care -- including family caregivers such as children or spouses -- are also known to experience loneliness in their roles and would benefit from greater societal appreciation and possible interventions such as respite care.  

Untreated hearing loss contributes to social isolation.  According to government statistics, among adults aged 70 and older with hearing loss who could benefit from hearing aids, fewer than 30% have ever used them. Denial and unreimbursed cost ($2400/ear) are factors, and delay in acquiring them can worsen the isolation.  Hearing aids today also offer features that include fall detection, smartphone integration, and AI capabilities.  Moving forward, Medicare Advantage plans are beginning to contribute to a portion of the cost. Audiologists play a role in managing user expectations and training an individual to adjust to the change from little or no sound to the noisy environment of stores, restaurants, office buildings and streets.

Click here to read the full white paper.



from Tips For Aging In Place https://www.ageinplacetech.com/blog/loneliness-and-social-isolation-focus-there-solutions-are-emerging

Monday, September 9, 2019

Four tech and aging blog posts from August, 2019

The last gasp of August and Labor Day's hurricane Dorian is behind us.  Note how a devastating Hurricane Dorian already has become a past tense Wikipedia entry (!). Now we must contemplate the fall season of tradeshows and events, rev up anticipation for impending technology announcements, consider that technology anti-trust investigations are launching in multiple states. Meanwhile,  The older adult technology market is still comprised of four main categories, into which the new entrants and inventions, including wearables, sensors, AI, and predictive analytics, will fit. The research report, Voice, Health, and Wellbeing 2020 has now launched and interviews are underway. Interest has grown in the use of technology to mitigate social isolation – more on that topic later this week, and the US population aged 65+ passed 52 million in 2018. What to make of all this? Here are the blog posts from August for consideration:

Wearables for Health and Wellbeing. How do wearables contribute to health and wellbeing of older adults? Did something happen recently propelling sales up 51% that pushed consumers out the door to buy a wearable, like a fitness band or a smartwatch? Was it the coolness of the Apple Watch? Was this the fear of ailments that worsen with lack of exercise? Or to put the question another way, what is it that these devices do that can help maintain or improve health, noting that 32% of baby boomers today get no exercise whatsoever, according to the CDC. However more than 50% are striving for 30 minutes per day and want feedback about how they're doing. Read more.

For older adults, consider that transitions are going to take longer. The baby boomer generation’s later years will be unprecedented.   Each time the population aged 65+ is counted, it’s a bigger number. That onslaught, now at 52 million, bears repeating.  The boomers, turning 65 at a rate of 10,000 a day, are pushing and prodding assumptions, deadlines, and pundit predictions. As they do so, they will force industries to change offerings – and drive considerable change in technology that underpins their lives. Consider signals from today's older adults that will only become more pronounced as the boomers move past today's upper age of 73. Read more.

A reminder: Moving beyond pilots.  Search for the word ‘pilot’ on this site. That is an interesting historical search – pages and pages of Start Me Up pilots in tech, programs, initiatives large and small, all linked, no doubt to corresponding media spend and press releases.  Think back on the cycles of tech deployment.  Remember the Alpha test, when the product barely worked at all.  After those bugs were uncovered by testers who had scripts designed for successful outcomes, it was time for the Beta test – where selected prospective users are identified, put the offering through its paces, under an assumption that the pilot will be converted to permanent deployment. Read more.

Will you be out and about in the fall? Especially for startups, going to events can reveal contacts that you may need or initiatives that you did not know even existed. Over the next few months, there are events around the country worth attending if schedules permit and interest areas match. Useful, besides sessions themselves, are exhibit areas where vendors offer new and existing solutions for the target audiences of the attendees.  For those who do not attend, check the exhibit hall online after the event if the organizers make that feature available.  Read more.

 



from Tips For Aging In Place https://www.ageinplacetech.com/blog/four-tech-and-aging-blog-posts-august-2019

In Good Company: InnovAge PACE

In Good Company: InnovAge PACE
Denver7 News speaks with Robin Doerr, chief sales and marketing officer, about the benefits innovAge PACE (Program of All-inclusive Care for the Elderly) offers. Learn more: MyInnovAge.com

from Tips For Aging In Place https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l8E_bIqh-og

Tuesday, September 3, 2019

Reinventing old age? Some MIT tech assertions are simplistic

MIT Technology Review’s "Old Age is Over" is thought provoking.  Or in the case of the technology section – "Old Age is Made Up," written by Joe Coughlin, head of the MIT Age Lab, the content is just plain provoking. We agree that old age is made up – but in this article, that assertion is underpinned with generalizations that are just, well, also made up. And it shows a lack of understanding about who benefits from technologies that exist in their current form, or that some of those have been upgraded well beyond his generalizations.  Consider:

Is the PERS industry a failed market?  Sized at $3.1 billion, is that failure? And is it just being coy to say that only 2% of the 52 million people aged 65+ has sought a PERS device? Does that percentage for the 65+ include the 20% (10 million) that are still working? Or the 1.3 million nursing home residents or the 85-year-olds who are working? Does the PERS device he is describing include the Apple Watch Series 4 app with a link to a call center?  The MobileHelp Smart with the Samsung watch? And does he get it -- why people need and benefit from PERS? Health status, including fall risk, recent discharge from a hospital, Parkinson’s, dementia and a host of other factors keep the market thriving.  In addition, companies are experimenting with radar, motion sensors, and other options, including voice assistants. These can augment or substitute for the need for a wearable on the body.

Most older adults are online?  Because it is easy, like most other observers he describes 65+ as a single demographic. That is akin to saying 10-year-olds are in the same age demographic as 30-year-olds. As with 20% of them still working, the 65-75 age range distorts the entire 65+ age bucket. According to Pew (who he quotes), 73% of the 65+ are online. Well, not exactly. According to Pew, Internet use for those aged 75-79 is only 60%, and it drops to 44% of the 80+. And let's not even mull access to broadband in the home, that's only 59%.  As for smartphones, only 31% of the 75-79 age group had them as of that survey date, and only 17% of the 80+ owned a smartphone -- neither of which is surprising dinvr the user interface (setup, data conversion, apps) of smartphones can daunting at any age.

Hearables may destigmatize hearing aids – really? For those with significant hearing loss, will “translation and augmenting certain environmental sounds” help people with severe hearing loss for whom hearing aids are life-changing?  Meanwhile, hearing aids are getting a makeover that the article ignores, including downward price movement, ability to buy them online (and over the counter), and coverage through Medicare Advantage plans – those changes alone makes them available to more people.  At the other end of the price curve, incorporating new features -- fall detection, AI, integration with smartphones – are all available now. That may make them more useful and desirable for those with significant hearing loss.

Ride-sharing services and home-delivered food keep people aging at home?  All fall into the category of necessary and useful, but these are not enough to keep people at home and out of ‘institutions.’ What are the real drivers to stay at home? Comfort in your own surroundings, lack of savings to pay for senior living, combined with a justifiable worry about their (long) life expectancy. Then if people remain at home and IF (a big IF) their health status enables them stay there, that may be feasible with family caregivers, supplemental home care, food delivery or and/or cleaning. But rides on demand from an app on your phone?  That’s a problem, as just noted in the New York Times – maybe that means hailing from a real phone, or for an appointment, using a provider-paid medical transportation ride.   

 



from Tips For Aging In Place https://www.ageinplacetech.com/blog/reinventing-old-age-some-mit-tech-assertions-are-simplistic